Website Chat from Envolve
What's the dealio Amelio?

2010 NZ Budget Kills Quality Early Childhood Centres

May 21st, 2010 Filed under: Life, Pre-School, Rants, Work | Tags: , , , , ,

Bill English striking a blow against children in New Zealand.

Bill English striking a blow against children in New Zealand.

Well it’s the 20th of May 2010 and the National government has released their 2010 Budget. As an Early Childhood Educator there was one major change to the budget that has really stood out to me. The decision to remove the incentive funding for Early Childhood Centres to have 100% qualified teachers.

As it stands now Centres get different amounts funding from the government depending on the percentage of (ratio-ed) staff they have that are qualified and registered Early Childhood Education teachers. So if you have 80% qualified teachers you get so much funding, if you have 100% then you get more. That extra money goes to classroom materials and staff wages, as you can imagine a qualified teacher gets paid more than an unqualified one.

Now the new 2010 budget changes this by removing the 100% incentive. Therefore to get the new maximum funding (equivalent to the old 80% incentive) a centre is only required to have 80% qualified teachers. Now, just think about this for a minute. This is some scary shit. Let me break it down for you.

Early Childhood Centres are businesses just like any other. They need to watch their bottom line. They need to make a profit, some are under more pressure than others (you know the ones… the big name ones on every corner who have stockholders). In order for a centre that currently employs 100% qualified teachers to stay at the same level of profit they do now under the new budget they have two options.

One, fire 20% of their qualified staff and hire people with no experience who will work for minimum wage. This of course results in a weaker education system for your young children. With no incentive for uneducated staff to study. In fact incentive for them not to study as it might just lead to their unemployment.

Two, increase the cost of sending a child to their centre. Labour’s education spokesman, Trevor Mallard, said the $100 million shortfall in ECE funding amounted to about $25 a week per parent. That’s a lot, more than your probably going to be getting in tax cuts!

This is where it starts to get really scary. Once all the Centres go down one of these two paths that leaves parents with a choice, a choice many of them have no real say in. Send your child to an expensive Centre where the teachers are all qualified and know how to professionally deal with your child’s needs during their most important and influential learning period, 0 to 5 years old. Or send them to a cheaper Centre where 80% qualified teachers is enough and hope your kid doesn’t fall through the cracks somewhere along the line.

Of course parents and whānau that live in lower socio-economic areas aren’t really going to have a choice are they? Which leads to yet another way to increase the gap between the haves and the have-nots. That’s right National, make sure that even if your under 5 years old, if you don’t have the money you don’t deserve the same level of education as people who do.

Scared yet? I am.

Show Comments (2)
  1. 1 Ki said at 2:06 am on May 21st, 2010:

    Notice how this is posted at 1 am. This has me so upset I couldn’t sleep until I vented by writing it down.

  2. 2 Rick said at 8:25 am on May 21st, 2010:

    Excellent analysis Ki. National is all about inequality. Also, notice on the news last night, the analysis of the amount of the money the tax cuts were going to save you stopped when they got down to $40,000 salary (there were no examples of how it effected those who earned less than this – just a throw-away comment that those on the benefit and pension would have an increase to equal the 2.5% increase in GST). As the price of oil goes up and the world financial troubles continue, this budget will help NZ stay in the recession as a large majority of people will become poorer.

Hide Comments

Add Your Own Comment

Guns in Early Childhood Centres

February 16th, 2010 Filed under: Pre-School, Rants, Work | Tags: , , ,

Guns in Early Childhood Education

Guns in Early Childhood Education

Currently my centre has a No Gun policy. They don’t allow toy guns and we are meant to tell the kids that guns are not allowed at pre-school if we see them pretending they have one.

This in my mind is stupid.

First of all, trust me when I say that I’m no gun activist. In fact, I’m completely against guns being used against human beings. But that being said I sure as hell played with water pistols when I was a child and I even had a BB Gun when I was in high school. I have fond memories of my friends all going down to the local primary school with our BB Guns and glasses and having wars late into the night. I still enjoy the odd paintball game now a days. This didn’t make me into a crazed killer. This was just a part of my boyhood.

Second, aren’t we meant to be working with the children’s interests? The kids at my centre are very interested in guns. Wouldn’t it be awesome to do a project on guns. Learn about the different types of guns. Learn what guns are used for? Learn about how to safely use guns. Learn about gun licenses? Make some gun licenses? Teach them what to do if they ever find a real gun? To me this sounds like a great idea, but I’ve had some pretty horrible “great” ideas in my life time. But then again what’s the alternative? Make guns, which are seen by kids everyday in their cartoons and stories, a taboo subject. Just pretend they don’t exist?

What’s your thoughts on toy guns at centres? Would you allow them at your child’s centre? If so, why and what rules would you expect to come with them? Would you forbid them? If so, why and how would you stop a child from pretending a stick is a gun?

Show Comments (3)
  1. 1 Barbara said at 10:18 am on February 20th, 2010:

    Well, Ki, I believe your blog is very significant and you have valid thought and opinions. I must say, as an educator for more than ten years, I have always worked at child care centers where there is a no guns policy. No weapons period. That meant even if they made swords. The thing is is that as early educators, we have to think of the generalization of our children. What separates them from learning what is right from wrong at school and at home. We never know what is being taught at home about guns in general. Some parents have no problem with it and others may be totally against it. We don’t want to offend the parents that are totally against weapons. And we also want to let the parents know that they are the primary teacher of their children in that aspect. Kind of like religion as well. Which is why a lot of day care centers either don’t celebrate any holidays or celebrate them all.
    But what I want to focus on is the point you made about working with the children’s interests. And you are so absolutely correct!!! This is something that educators tend to loose track of when it comes to sensitive issues like weapons. Of course if all the children were interested in dinosaurs, educators will go all out to create a extensive theme on dinosaurs and get extravagant… but not with weapons like guns. I could go on and on. Especially with this society and the views that it puts out there… For example, with police officers. Society tends to make it seems like police officers are bad and send a message to children that they are there to take you to jail if you’re bad, and child care centers work so hard to change their mind set from society that police officers are good and are there to protect and serve. Which is very true… and what we should think about police officers regardless of what children see and hear…
    Guns and weapons are very taboo in the child care world. And educators have made it that way. There are many reasons why and why not. And we could go around in circles forever. I would say, that if it’s the child’s interest, especially if the curriculum you are using is child-centered, and it’s ok by the parents, if I were a director of a center, I would allow a thematic unit on guns.
    I appreciate your feedback and will keep it in mind as I continue in my career in ECE. Thank you!

  2. 2 jim kassiones said at 11:30 am on March 20th, 2010:

    The kids,I believe, are interested in toy guns,not real guns. When I was in Grade 6 our class learned how to handle a rifle, how to check to see if it was loaded and while at a rifle range how to shoot a rifle. We were sufficiently mature enough to learn these lessons. I believe it was wise because a lot of our parents had rifles at home which we had the potential to come into contact with.
    I’m still glad I learned to safely handle a rifle. I don’t know if you could properly teach a child how to safely check that a rifle is unloaded and safe to handle without using a real one for the instruction.

  3. 3 Tom O'Carroll said at 6:42 pm on May 26th, 2010:

    I agree about following children’s interests.
    As a young boy I played war games, cowboys and indians, and more. We fashioned up guns out of anything we could find. My father did not believe in guns but was happy as long as we never pointed our guns at anyone’s face.

    My experience in a centre has shown me that a no gun policy will not stop a disposition to explore guns in dramatic play. There is science, construction, drama, exploring the concept of death, not to mention physical play involved in guns.

    I have outgrown guns and have moved on to new interests. I am sure most of the young children we support will do the same

Hide Comments

Add Your Own Comment

What’s Wrong With Judging People

December 5th, 2009 Filed under: Rants, Web | Tags: , , , , ,

YouTube Preview Image
Discussing my thoughts on judging people that were brought up by comments on my Christian Side Hug Video.


Add Your Own Comment

Single Easiest Way To Improve Your Teaching

October 30th, 2009 Filed under: Rants | Tags: , ,

Pick me! Pick me!

Pick me! Pick me!

Praise your students for answering questions incorrectly! You heard me right, shower your students with praise when they don’t know the right answer, but try to answer anyway. This may sound completely backwards when you first hear it, but just think about it and it becomes clear.

If you only praise students that answer correctly then no one learns anything. Why? Simple the students that can answer already know the answer, and the kids that can’t don’t want to answer because there is no motivation for them to. If they aren’t answering then you can bet your ass that they probably aren’t listening either. On the other hand, if someone answers and gets it wrong, then they naturally want to know what the right answer is, and so will others. You learn more from a wrong answer than you do from a right one. So instead, encourage participation over knowledge. Praise everyone that raises their hand or even shouts out! Count yourself lucky, if you have a classroom full of students so eager to participate that they can’t even wait to put up their hands.

So, how do you get them participating? I like to play games and award points for answering whether right or wrong. Make sure to make teams and have a rule that states each member must answer before another team mate can answer again. This will cause students to encourage each other to participate. Remember give verbal praise and points for all answers, if it happens to be wrong encourage other students to help come up with the answer and explain it. Once you’ve played a couple of times, students will just get use to participating, trying to answering questions and helping others who answer incorrectly. Your classroom will transform from a teacher lead Q&A session with only a few students joining in to a classroom full of students participating and discussing ideas and reasoning behind those ideas with each other.

If your students feel comfortable and safe enough to answer a question even if they are most likely going to get the answer wrong, then you my friend are in the top 10% of teachers. Once you have them participating, you’ve got them listening and thinking. With participation knowledge will follow, it’s inevitable! It really is that simple.

Show Comments (3)
  1. 1 Marissa said at 1:59 am on October 31st, 2009:

    What a brilliant tip :) For the kind of teaching I do the rewards and team thing won’t work, but I will be aware of how I respond to the wrong answers in the future. Thanks for posting

  2. 2 Ki said at 9:39 am on October 31st, 2009:

    Thanks Marissa! Yeah the games side work more for the younger kids.

  3. 3 What About Ki? » Blog Archive » Schools Kill Creativity said at 11:28 pm on November 4th, 2009:

    [...] bits are the important ones?I recently wrote about the importance of rewarding participation over knowledge within a classroom. I discussed how by doing this it helps everyone in the class learn [...]

Hide Comments

Add Your Own Comment

Propaganda Machine

September 13th, 2009 Filed under: Pre-School, Rants, Work | Tags: , ,

Propaganda Machine

Propaganda Machine

While the site was down, the pre-school where I work had a visitor. A nice clown that came to read books and sing about the importance of using your seat belt while in the car… whether you’re driving near or far. Anywho, as you’ve probably already noticed from the picture, this wasn’t just any clown this was Ronald McDonald! I can’t believe they let this guy in the door, talk about getting them when their young.

He did a great job of entertaining the kids and even talked to them about what they liked to eat. He said he liked apples? Make no mistakes, all these kids knew that this was the clown from McDonalds. While it sounds like he is promoting healthy eating by saying he likes apples, all he really doing is pumping the kids and parents full of propaganda that McDiddy’s is a healthy fun and family oriented restaurant. In reality no one should be eating at McD’s let alone any child! Do yourself and your children a favour and stay away from the golden arches and all their fast food friends.

Show Comments (5)
  1. 1 SkinBintin said at 8:34 pm on October 15th, 2009:

    Wow! That’s terrible. Not only is McDonald’s an unhealthy eating option, it’s just garbage full stop. McDonald’s cardboard ‘food’ soaked in oil can’t touch the food that can be prepared at home, for considerably less.

    I’m shocked that McDonald’s are still using their Buckle Up campaign as a cheap ploy to get into school’s to push their disgusting trade.

    This sort of thing should be banned at a government level. And while they are at it they should outlaw the child bait these places use known to us common folk as Cheap Movie Tie-in Promotional ‘Toys’.

    I hope you took it upon yourselves to show the young ones a good example and kick him out the door!

    (Speaking of the Young One’s, I suddenly have a desire to dig out my Young One’s DVD’s!)

  2. 2 marissa said at 9:10 pm on October 15th, 2009:

    Nice way to promo your site :) Didn’t realise you were up n running again… Actually wanted to reply to this anyway. You’re right, it’s pretty filthy and quite blatant promotion. I saw an interview with an ex-Ronald McDonald impersonator once and it was disgusting… they had to make the children chant “McDonalds, McDonalds” and all sorts.

    Actually this is the guy I saw: http://www.mcspotlight.org/campaigns/history/confessions.html

    It was in the documentary “McLibel” about the case in the UK where McDonalds sued a couple of handing out anti-McD pamphlets.

  3. 3 SkinBintin said at 3:29 am on October 17th, 2009:

    Anyone know where I could get my hands on McLibel here in NZ? That sounds like an interesting Doco… Wouldn’t mind watching it. :)

  4. 4 Ki said at 9:17 am on October 17th, 2009:

    Can’t remember if you are in Christchurch or not, but if you are then Alice in Videoland on High St has a copy!

  5. 5 Lisette Casey said at 1:38 am on October 22nd, 2009:

    If Obama’s speech wasn’t allowed to be shown in some schools, certainly this clown should be banned from the list.

Hide Comments

Add Your Own Comment

Rush Hour 3 – Subtitles, What Subtitles?

September 13th, 2009 Filed under: Movies, Rants, Reviews | Tags: , , , ,

Rush Hour 3

Rush Hour 3

I sat down and watched Rush Hour 3 on DVD for the first time a week or two ago. I knew it wasn’t going to be very good, but I’m a fan of Jackie Chan and the crazy moves he does so I had to do it. I was correct in my assumption that it wouldn’t be the best movie by a long shot, but that’s not what I’m ranting about today. For anyone who has seen Rush Hour 3, you’ll know that the movie is set in France, so logically there are a few scenes that involved a bit of French dialog. Not being able to understand French at all (sorry Mrs. Green for not paying attention in French class), I decided to check if there were English subtitles so I could follow what was being said. There was so I turned the on and watched a scene again. Check out the screen shot of what the subtitles gave me in all their glory…

Subtitles?
Now bear in mind that “We’re gonna need…” is what they are saying in English. What they are saying in French is translated to “(Speaking in French)”! How useless is that!


Add Your Own Comment

Slave to the Box

July 17th, 2009 Filed under: Rants | Tags: , ,

Nothing but Garbage on TV

Nothing but Garbage on TV

I have become a fucking slave to television again. Everything in New Zealand closes the same time everyone gets off work, for some fucked up reason, so I spend my nights veged out in front of the box. My mind is turning into play dough, and not that colourful highlighter stuff you get at boutique toy stores or from the internet, nope the year old half dried grey coloured crap you find in the sale bin at K-Mart. It’s really quite depressing. But I’m actively trying to change that so I have started to read books again. Unfortunately I’m so hooked to the boob tube that I’m actually reading on my ipod. Must be getting some kind of fix from the pixelated goodness.

If there are any good books you can recommend to me leave them in the comments. If they aren’t available in ebook format that’s even better!

Show Comments (5)
  1. 1 Shen said at 2:39 am on July 17th, 2009:

    Books are just another way of submitting your mind over to the man.

    You really need to get back into creating stuff, so others can submit their will to you.

    That said, The Book of Dave by Will Self (around 600 pages I think) was very interesting, although quite bleak.

    I just finished reading The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett (around 1100 pages) which is set in 12C England about building a Cathedral. Some of the writing is terrible, and the characters are all black and white, but it was an enjoyable enough read.

    The Dune series was quite good, if you haven’t read it yet. It got a lot better after the first book or 2 I thought.

    I would also recommend almost anything by Kurt Vonnigut, Charles Bukowski or William Gibson (read his books in order, because they follow on from each other)

  2. 2 Rick said at 2:56 pm on July 18th, 2009:

    The RiverWorld Series by Farmer is good SF. Steinbeck – most stuff by him is very enjoyable.

  3. 3 Sean said at 1:16 am on August 5th, 2009:

    I’ve been trying to read some earlier 20th century books recently.
    I can recommend The Lost World by Arthur Conan Doyle for light reading, and For Whom The Bell Tolls by Ernest Hemingway for something more serious.

  4. 4 jim kassiones said at 5:49 am on December 19th, 2009:

    Personally I like true adventure stories. Alone by Admiral Richard Byrd,Endurance by Alfred Lansing, Out of Africa by Isak Dinesen. If you like fiction try Anne Tyler I’ve pretty well read all of her books at least twice.

  5. 5 Ki said at 9:15 am on December 19th, 2009:

    Cool, thanks for the suggestions. I’ll have a look for some of those at the library.

Hide Comments

Add Your Own Comment